<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Image of Fish &#187; Theopoetics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theimageoffish.com/tag/theopoetics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theimageoffish.com</link>
	<description>we swim in interpretation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Humanity Certainty?</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/07/12/is-humanity-certainty/</link>
		<comments>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/07/12/is-humanity-certainty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Derr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numinous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theopoetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason Derr&#39;s Article, the comments are way down on that page. More information about theopoetics. Tweet This Post]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/07/12/is-humanity-certainty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Bother with Theology?</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/06/22/why-bother-with-theology/</link>
		<comments>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/06/22/why-bother-with-theology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numinous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surplus of meaning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theopoetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/2010/06/22/why-bother-with-theolog/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The oft captivating&#160;Blake Huggins at (Ir)religiosity has prompted me once again. &#160;I encourage folks to go give his post &#34;The task of the theologian: responsibility for God,&#34; a read and/or check out my thoughts on a very similar topic below. &#160; What do we Gain with a Doctrine of God?&#160; What do we accomplish in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/06/22/why-bother-with-theology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Road Theopoetics</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/04/26/on-the-road-theopoetics/</link>
		<comments>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/04/26/on-the-road-theopoetics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 04:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pastoral Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quakerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catherine Keller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claremont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Lopresti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process Thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theopoetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vince Colapietro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lots of things in this one&#8230; The QUIP Quaker Writers conference was held to coincide with the release of this book (which I have a few things in). The Center for Process Studies at Claremont hosted the Theopoetics and the Divine Manifold conference&#160;, at which, most academically noteable for me (at this moment), were Catherine [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/04/26/on-the-road-theopoetics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theology After Google</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/03/07/theology-after-google/</link>
		<comments>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/03/07/theology-after-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 01:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quakerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology After Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theopoetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; Via their website: &#160; &#160; Why &#8220;theology after Google&#8221;? Progressive Christian theologians have some vitally important things to say, things that both the church and society desperately need to hear. The trouble is, we tend to deliver our message using technologies that date back to Gutenberg: books, academic articles, sermons, and so forth. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/03/07/theology-after-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interpretive Communities, a Request, and a Heraldic Gospel</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/12/14/interpretive-communities-a-request-and-a-heraldic-gospel/</link>
		<comments>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/12/14/interpretive-communities-a-request-and-a-heraldic-gospel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blake Huggins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Brink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phillip Clayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theopoetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transforming Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a recent video from the Transforming Theology project, Phillip Clayton asked Tony Jones how the internet and Google have been at work changing theology. Jones replied that it allows for a greater, more broad based, access to information, and forum for feedback.  I agree. In a Dec. 14 post on his blog, Jonathan Brink writes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/12/14/interpretive-communities-a-request-and-a-heraldic-gospel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Žižek, Narrative, and Transformation</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/11/14/zizek-narrative-and-transformation/</link>
		<comments>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/11/14/zizek-narrative-and-transformation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amos Wilder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ricoeur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theopoetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Žižek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over at his blog, Matt Gallion raised some interesting questions, via a comment from Slavoj Žižek, about the role of narrative in our thinking.  Long story short, the question seemed to me to be about effective and persuasive communication:  Are we best served by prosaic and uber-clear communication, or is there something to be said [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/11/14/zizek-narrative-and-transformation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
