<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Image of Fish &#187; Hermeneutics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theimageoffish.com/tag/hermeneutics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theimageoffish.com</link>
	<description>we swim in interpretation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:50:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Theology After Google</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/03/07/theology-after-google/</link>
		<comments>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/03/07/theology-after-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 01:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quakerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology After Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theopoetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; &#160; Via their website: &#160; &#160; Why &#8220;theology after Google&#8221;? Progressive Christian theologians have some vitally important things to say, things that both the church and society desperately need to hear. The trouble is, we tend to deliver our message using technologies that date back to Gutenberg: books, academic articles, sermons, and so forth. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/03/07/theology-after-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interpretive Communities, a Request, and a Heraldic Gospel</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/12/14/interpretive-communities-a-request-and-a-heraldic-gospel/</link>
		<comments>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/12/14/interpretive-communities-a-request-and-a-heraldic-gospel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 02:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blake Huggins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Brink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phillip Clayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theopoetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transforming Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a recent video from the Transforming Theology project, Phillip Clayton asked Tony Jones how the internet and Google have been at work changing theology. Jones replied that it allows for a greater, more broad based, access to information, and forum for feedback.  I agree. In a Dec. 14 post on his blog, Jonathan Brink writes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/12/14/interpretive-communities-a-request-and-a-heraldic-gospel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;It Is&#8221; and &#8220;It Means&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/12/04/it-is-and-it-means/</link>
		<comments>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/12/04/it-is-and-it-means/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 18:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Raschke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doubt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious belief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Fish]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m still several posts away from actually addressing the importance of community in individual interpretation, but it appears I am one step closer. What I am interested in for this post has been inspired by a number of relatively unrelated pieces of information I have recently come across: A story from Stanley Fish&#8217;s book, Is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/12/04/it-is-and-it-means/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Postmodernity?</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/11/20/what-is-postmodernity/</link>
		<comments>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/11/20/what-is-postmodernity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postmodernism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often times those interested in Postmodernism are so interested in the topic that they sometimes struggle to talk about it in a way that is concrete and accessible to folks not already interested.  In this video I try to explain my understanding of postmodernity in a way that folks can get at without needing a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/11/20/what-is-postmodernity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postmodernity, Hermeneutics, and the Second Naïveté</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/11/16/postmodernity-hermeneutics-and-the-second-naivete/</link>
		<comments>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/11/16/postmodernity-hermeneutics-and-the-second-naivete/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Callid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emergent/Emerging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emergent Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hermeneutics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ricoeur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning, Tony Jones published on his blog the contents of a chapter he wrote for The Justice Project. In it he discusses the utility of some aspects of postmodern thought to the faithful Christian.  His particular consideration of Hans-Georg Gadamer and Paul Ricoeur and the hermeneutic of humility prompted me to add on to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theimageoffish.com/2009/11/16/postmodernity-hermeneutics-and-the-second-naivete/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
