<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Bother with Theology?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theimageoffish.com/2010/06/22/why-bother-with-theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/06/22/why-bother-with-theology/</link>
	<description>we swim in interpretation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 21:32:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Turri</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/06/22/why-bother-with-theology/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Turri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 15:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/2010/06/22/why-bother-with-theolog/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>You inspire me to answer the call of the Infinite Callid! Thanks for doing what you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You inspire me to answer the call of the Infinite Callid! Thanks for doing what you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Image of Fish » Why Bother with Theology? -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/06/22/why-bother-with-theology/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Image of Fish » Why Bother with Theology? -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/2010/06/22/why-bother-with-theolog/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Emergent Village, Blake Huggins and THEOPOETICS(dot)NET, Callid Keefe-Perry. Callid Keefe-Perry said: Why Bother with Theology? http://ht.ly/21FW9 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Emergent Village, Blake Huggins and THEOPOETICS(dot)NET, Callid Keefe-Perry. Callid Keefe-Perry said: Why Bother with Theology? <a href="http://ht.ly/21FW9" rel="nofollow">http://ht.ly/21FW9</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Huggins</title>
		<link>http://theimageoffish.com/2010/06/22/why-bother-with-theology/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Huggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageoffish.com/2010/06/22/why-bother-with-theolog/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>This is one of the reasons why I appreciate what Jack Caputo has been doing -- and theopoetics at large really, something I need to familiarize myself with more -- in theologizing God as a type of Deleuzian event, not something that is happening per se but something happening &lt;em&gt;in&lt;/em&gt; what it is happening as the condition of possibility (or im/possibility).

It also strikes to the heart of one of those old but increasingly outmoded chicken-or-the-egg questions. &#160;I&#039;ve had more conversations then I&#039;d care to count surrounding the issue of whether one should begin with theology proper (a doctrine of God) or theological anthropology. It seems to me though -- and I hear this in your post -- that the boundaries between the two are, for better or worse, more porous and less static than we may be willing to believe. &#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the reasons why I appreciate what Jack Caputo has been doing &#8212; and theopoetics at large really, something I need to familiarize myself with more &#8212; in theologizing God as a type of Deleuzian event, not something that is happening per se but something happening <em>in</em> what it is happening as the condition of possibility (or im/possibility).</p>
<p>It also strikes to the heart of one of those old but increasingly outmoded chicken-or-the-egg questions. &nbsp;I&#39;ve had more conversations then I&#39;d care to count surrounding the issue of whether one should begin with theology proper (a doctrine of God) or theological anthropology. It seems to me though &#8212; and I hear this in your post &#8212; that the boundaries between the two are, for better or worse, more porous and less static than we may be willing to believe. &nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

